My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 06/2004

Anchor Point Fund

« Cocoa Puffs | Main | Tough Week »

Friday, August 19, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345258da69e200d83453f6bd53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Faith in Science:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Dave Jilk

I like the term "radical atheist" even though it is redundant... seems like it would help to avoid that "don't you mean 'agnostic' conversation?

People who say they are agnostics are merely atheists who have not thought too hard about what knowledge is. The formal meaning of Agnostic is that one *cannot* know whether there is a God. But this position makes no sense, as Dawkins and Adams points out -- no one obsesses about the idea that we can't REALLY know whether there is a Santa Claus. If you believe that there is not enough evidence to conclude that there is a God... then your working assumption is that there is not a God. Which makes you an atheist.

I've had the same view as Adams on the "hedging" issue. If there is a God and she is so egotistical and mean-spirited as to damn me for simply using the rational faculty that she gave me to the best of my ability, well, that isn't a God I can worship anyway, it sounds more like a tyrant CEO than an omniscient, omnipotent being. But this is normally just an explanation I give when people ask me whether I should hedge -- I really don't see any need to in any case.

By the way, www.radicalatheists.com/org are available...

The comments to this entry are closed.

stylefeeder